Tyler Zink vs Kyle Seelig Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Zink vs K. Seelig

Tyler Zink
USA
w
w
l
w
l
l
l
l
w
l
1
Win
2
Played
1
Win
24
Age
28
-
Height
5'9" (175 cm)
293
C. Rank
886
278
Best Rank
349
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$4.9K
Career Money
$4.1K
-
Plays
Right-Handed

Kyle Seelig
USA
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
w
l
1
Win
2
Played
1
Win
24
Age
28
-
Height
5'9" (175 cm)
293
C. Rank
886
278
Best Rank
349
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$4.9K
Career Money
$4.1K
-
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Zink 1 - 1 Seelig
They have played 4 sets in total, with Tyler Zink winning 2 and Kyle Seelig winning 2. The last match between Kyle Seelig and Tyler Zink was at the M15 Pittsburgh, 16-07-2022, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Kyle Seelig getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Zink | 1 |
| Seelig | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(SF) M15 Pittsburgh(07-16-22)
Kyle Seelig
6
6
Tyler Zink
2
4
(Q1) M15 Fayetteville(11-03-20)
Tyler Zink
7
6
Kyle Seelig
6
4
T. Zink vs K. Seelig H2H Profile
T. Zink vs K. Seelig Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tyler Zink has won 44.44% of points on their second serve, while Kyle Seelig has won 46.70%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tyler Zink, in recent form, has won 43.55% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kyle Seelig has won 47.44%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.66% and 24.36% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tyler Zink has saved 56.73% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kyle Seelig has saved 50.00% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tyler Zink has won 54.41% of matches played (W/L 37/31), with Kyle Seelig winning 10.00% (W/L 1/9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tyler Zink has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 31/23), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/1). Kyle Seelig has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 91/51), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 13/15).
- Player level: In the last year, Tyler Zink has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.15% of matches (W/L 18/21), where as Kyle Seelig has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 14.29% of matches (W/L 1/6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Tyler Zink winning 1 times and Kyle Seelig being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Tyler Zink winning 2 and Kyle Seelig winning 2.
- The last match between Tyler Zink and Kyle Seelig was at the M15 Pittsburgh, 16-07-2022, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Kyle Seelig getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:36:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tyler Zink has played against opponents with an average rank of 328.4 while Kyle Seelig has played against players with an average rank of 229.9.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tyler Zink has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kyle Seelig has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tyler Zink has converted 31.65% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kyle Seelig has converted 26.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Tyler Zink vs Kyle Seelig Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Zink vs K. Seelig H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 19 | Games Won | 22 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:36:0 | Average Match Time | 0:36:0 |
| 59% (39/66) | 1st Serve % | 83% (39/47) |
| 62% (24/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (28/39) |
| 33% (9/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 88% (7/8) |
| 33% (1/3) | Break Pts Won % | 57% (4/7) |
| 26% (12/47) | Return Points Win % | 50% (33/66) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Zink 49%, Seelig 47%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Zink 49%, Seelig 48%.
Break Points Saved %: Zink 61%, Seelig 50%.
T. Zink Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(5) 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
K. Seelig Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 7-6(3) | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 7-5 | ||

T. Zink vs K. Seelig Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.30% (101/85) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.54% (144/90) |
| 52.26% (220/201) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.62% (313/212) |
| 50.90% (2066/1993) | Games Win/Loss | 54.37% (2602/2184) |
| 52.08% (50/46) | Hard Win/Loss | 64.08% (91/51) |
| 57.41% (31/23) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.50% (40/24) |
| 55.88% (19/15) | Indoor Hard W/L | 46.43% (13/15) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.42 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 826 | Aces Total | 158 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 380 | Total Double Faults | 295 |
| 1:34:29 | Average Match Time | 1:16:42 |
| 412.59 | Average Opponent Rank | 401.7 |
| 59% (6946/11839) | 1st Serve % | 70% (8148/11718) |
| 71% (4897/6946) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (5161/8148) |
| 50% (2442/4893) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (1853/3569) |
| 38% (426/1109) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (616/1313) |
| 38% (4374/11514) | Return Points Win % | 43% (5060/11864) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Main Tour W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 44.00% (22/28) | Challenger W/L | 29.63% (8/19) |
| 59.09% (78/54) | Futures W/L | 66.18% (135/69) |
| 54% (100/185) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (140/229) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 48% (26/54) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (25/51) |
| 62% (31/50) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (32/60) |
| 87% (102/89) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (142/124) |
| 13% (102/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (142/17) |
| 14% (84/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (92/19) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
08:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction01:30 PM 19/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 20/11/25
Prediction04:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction07:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction05:30 PM 19/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

18 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Eva Vedder vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

18 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Shintaro Mochizuki vs Federico Arnaboldi Prediction – ATP Bergamo Challenger – 18th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
20:00
H2H 1-0
12:00
H2H 0-0
12:30
H2H 0-0
12:30
H2H 0-0
12:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Santiago
Chile
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M15 Tallahassee
United States
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal